AZ Federation of Republican Women Day at the Legislature

NOTE: I will be attending and participating in this event.

From Cyndi Collins, President AzFRW:

The AzFRW Day at the Legislature will be held next Friday, March 28.

10:00am Group Photo in Wesley Bolin Park

10:30am/11:30am House Hearing Room 1

Hon. Laura Knaperek will be explain the role of lobbyists, how bill are created and we will be role playing.

11:30am/12:30pm House Floor

GOP representatives will explain how bills are created, discussed and voted on as we sit at lawmakers' desks.

1:00pm/1:45pm Lunch/2nd Floor Conference Room of the Executive Tower
Speakers: State Treasurer Dean Martin & State School Superindendint Tom Horne

2:00pm/2:45pm Tour Sec. of State Office, 7th Floor, Executive Towner

Half the group will split and tour Old Capitol Building w/Chloe Kavanaugh

2:55pm/3:30pm Groups exchange tour guides.

Cost: $18 per person includes lunch w/soft drink, cookies and choice of:

Oriental Chicken Salad
Southwest Chicken
Chicken Caesar Salad

Please wear Red to show how proud we are to be Republican women!


tucsonblonde@cox.net

HB 2269 ~Prevents Nurses from Performing Abortions

NOTE: Click the above link and you will be taken to the summary of the bill. Now, notice the title of the bill refers to Behavioral Health Copying Fees but the language of the bill has been amended to reflect the subject discussed below. This is an example of a "striker" or a bill that has been amended with a "strike-everything" amendment. The old language of the bill is stricken and the new language added.


From Cathi Herrod, President of the Center for Arizona Policy:

Two weeks ago, I told you about a nurse practitioner who has been performing surgical abortions for Planned Parenthood. For months, the Board of Nursing has been reviewing the situation but failing to take any action.

This week, the Board of Nursing again looked at the matter, and many Board members expressed doubt that a surgical abortion is within a nurse’s scope of practice. Amazingly, the Board refused to intervene, allowing this nurse to continue to perform first and second trimester surgical abortions! State law does not authorize non-doctors to perform abortions, but, according to Planned Parenthood, this has been their regular practice for the past eight years. Because the Board of Nursing continues to delay and Planned Parenthood continues to defy the obvious implications of current law, Rep. Bob Stump proposed a bill (HB 2269) specifically prohibiting nurses from performing surgical abortions. The reaction from abortion advocates has been bordering on panic, as they struggle to find doctors willing to take the lives of preborn babies. This is a huge safety issue. If something goes wrong, women need a doctor, not a nurse. Abortion advocates claim to care about women’s health but oppose a reasonable bill like this one that will protect women from having a risky surgical procedure performed by a non-doctor.

HB 2269 passed through the House Rules Committee and the party caucuses and will be debated during COW on the House floor next week.

Constituent Mail: SB1214~Concealed Weapons, School Grounds

NOTE: This piece of constituent mail was written to a Senator (not our Senator Gould) who voted against SB 1214 which allows people with a valid CCW permit to carry on the grounds of a community college or university.

Dear Senator "XYZ",

We are two of your voting constituents (District "007") and voted for you in your last election. You are our voice and we want you to vote YES on SB 1214!

This bill is to allow people with a concealed weapons (CCW) permit "to carry" on a school campus. Have you taken a Concealed Weapons training course, Senator "XYZ"? We are trained not only on how to use a weapon, but when NOT TO USE a weapon. If I am in fear for my life, my weapon "might" be used only if certain safety criteria are met first before shooting. We are taught gun safety! A CCW permit holder is not imitating the Wild West days of Jesse James and running ramped or firing a gun at will.

You have upheld our Second Amendment rights in the past and we demand that our rights to carry a concealed weapon even on a school campus be honored as well.

Thank you for your YES vote on SB 1214, and we look forward to hearing back from you on this matter.

THE FISCAL NOTE

An Examination of Tax and Fiscal Matters by the Arizona Free Enterprise Club

Economic Stimulus: What to Embrace, What to Avoid

Former U.S. Treasury economist Stephen Entin wrote: There is no such thing as a quick, temporary fiscal stimulus for the economy that does not lead to offsetting damage down the road. The only worthwhile tax changes that are beneficial in the short run are those that are also beneficial in the long run, ones that lead to a tax system with fewer obstacles to production.

There has been much discussion recently around designing an “economic stimulus” package for Arizona. It is easy to see why. Revenues for fiscal year 2008 will be up only 1%, and we’ll be lucky if 2009 is any better. What to do? Given the backdrop from Mr. Entin, here are some suggestions.

AVOID: Do not incur additional debt to “stimulate” construction activity. A plan being circulated by universities and contractors to borrow $1.4 billion to facilitate construction at Arizona’s three universities is not an economics stimulus package. Here’s why. If the state needs to issue additional debt to cover the activity of construction, it is simply borrowing the economic benefit created by the construction, leaving no additional benefit to the public, since they (we) own the debt. Arizona already faces a state and local debt burden of $32 billion, which is 16th highest in the country as a percentage of personal income, and the state has a $3 billion budget deficit. The added debt from this proposal will be extremely painful long-term.

AVOID: Do not advance a plan comprised of tax credits, new spending items, and new debt packages. In the face of Arizona’s huge budget deficit, a plan being discussed in the House to add new credits, grants, and spending would exacerbate the problem. With mounting debt and flat revenues, adding new subsidies and spending items will further choke off economic growth. Economic stimulus packages require an incentive effect. When tax rates are cut, for example, the incentive to earn the next dollar increases, since the return on investment is now greater. Tax credits, like rebates or subsidies, have no incentive effect, do not increase output or demand, and simply leave fewer taxpayers to pay for existing services.


SUPPORT: Make the 2006 state equalization tax cut permanent. Isn’t it ironic that proponents of a construction “stimulus package” are some of the same people who oppose making permanent the temporary elimination of the state equalization rate? There is no compelling reason to not make permanent a tax cut that lawmakers and the governor saw fit to provide in 2006. There is no negative impact to the state’s general fund next year by passing this permanent moratorium. Raising taxes $250 million in an economy that is already experiencing anemic growth, however, will further slow economic recovery. It will drive up expenses for everyone from latte drinkers to the construction industry (and everyone in between). Any economic stimulus plan that doesn’t include making this tax cut permanent isn’t a serious plan.


Given the state’s $3 billion budget deficit for 2008 and 2009 and the membership of the House and Senate, it is well-understood that asking for more than the permanent repeal of the state equalization tax is pushing the envelope. If, however, there is interest in other stimulus plans that will have both a short and long-term benefit to our economy and tax code, here are two:

SUPPORT: Reduce Arizona’s business personal property tax. Reducing the tax on business equipment, or allowing for immediate expensing, would spur new spending on plants and equipment, increase wages, increase jobs, and ultimately increase tax revenue to the state. A recent study completed for Idaho by Stephen Entin at the Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation demonstrates the economic benefits of this rate cut.

SUPPORT: Reduce Arizona’s corporate income tax rate. Arizona’s tax on corporate income is 6.968% and is among the highest in the west (behind only California and New Mexico). Corporate taxes affect three things: 1) customers, through prices; 2) shareholders, through returns on invested capital; and 3) employees, through employment opportunities and wage growth. According to a new study by Fritz Foley and Mihir Desai of Harvard and James Hines of the Univ. of Michigan, workers share between 45 and 70 percent of the corporate tax burden. Reducing corporate taxes down to 4.76%, the average among western states, would instantly make Arizona more competitive in the region and across the country, increase after tax profits, increase employment opportunities, and increase wage growth. Reducing this tax to 4.54% would place the corporate income tax on equal footing with Arizona businesses and individuals who file income taxes in the state’s highest personal income tax bracket. In a fair tax system that encourages growth, neutrality is paramount.


Finally, the adage of “First, do no harm,” applies to this debate. Cutting taxes on capital would be the preferred tax changes to help Arizona’s economy both short and long-term. Short of that, however, doing nothing is far better than some of what’s being discussed at the Capitol.

###

The Arizona Free Enterprise Club is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization whose mission is to advance policies that promote a strong and vibrant Arizona economy. The Club believes that entrepreneurs and private enterprise are the principle drivers of our economy. The Club lobbies Arizona lawmakers in support of policies that allow the market to flourish and vigorously opposes policies that hinder private industry. Visit us at www.azfec.org.

Havasu Heals Havasu

A message from Kathy Hodel and the Havasu Community Health Foundation:

Our local Cancer Association of Havasu created a new educational program called "Havasu HEALS Havasu". The program includes a 30 minutes television show on TV 45 hosted by Theresa and a quarterly newsletter that will be inserted in our newspaper.

The goal is to educate our residents on cancer prevention and also inform them what services are available in Havasu if you have cancer. IT'S ALL LOCAL!

Our TV show will be airing on TV 45:

Wednesdy & Sunday at 5:00pm

Monday and Sat at 10:00am.

OUI Bill Heads To House

Senator Linda Gray's OUI bill, SB 1080 passed out of the Senate last week and now comes to the House. Critics lament the elimination of the civil penalty of $1,250 for refusing to submit to a blood alcohol concentration test that was a part of the original bill. Watch to see if there will be an attempt in the House to amend the bill to include this provision.

The Way Things Work

Why oh why, would a county official author a press release against a bill I co-sponsored urging others to contact me before talking with me himself?

Weird.

Difficult to understand are the actions of this gentleman, especially since he spends so much time at the Capitol. Why would he not mention his stance on this bill when we stood together last weekend, in silence under the sun? (Special Olympics, LHC)

Strange, the way things work sometimes...

This particular bill has been in the system since January. It is nothing new. It was heard in a House Committee meeting at least two weeks ago (February 7th actually, I just checked) where many representatives from District III testified of its need. (Not one person signed in against this legislation.)

I am not "married" to the bill as they sometimes say at the Capitol, explaining the unhealthy relationship members have with a bill they sponsor. I signed on to this out of respect for my seatmate and the local officials who explained their need for such a law. Since then I have written here about the bill and have also noted it's existence in other forums. Not a peep have I heard in opposition of this bill.

Until now.

Who knows, this bill may be terrible and full of unintended consequences. I am certainly open to killing the bill if it is awful, holding it if it is bad, and amending it, if it is only good, in order to make it better. But that is not my point.

MY POINT:

Mr. Supervisor, why the press release?
Am I that unapproachable?
Forget where my office is?
On the third floof, 309.

Mr. Supervisor, you're the "good one", not the name caller
Not a phone caller?
Thought you were reasonable
What gives?

Hoping to hear from you Mr. Supervisor!

602-926-5408

Arizona Municipal Water User's Association Weekly Update

UPDATE: I look forward to talking with Mohave County Supervisor Buster Johnson regarding his concerns about this particular piece of legislation.

HB 2132 County Water Authority; Colorado River
AMWUA Position: Support
MCWA Postition: Support

Bill Provisions:

HB 2132 amends ARS § 45-2244 to eliminate the industrial use restriction on a portion of Mohave County Water Authority’s Colorado River allocation.

Background:

In 1994, legislation was adopted to provide for the formation of the Mohave County Water Authority (MCWA).

The members of MCWA are Bullhead City, City of Kingman, Lake Havasu City, Mohave County, Golden Shores Irrigation District, Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District, and the Mohave Water Conservation District.

The impetus to forming MCWA was to put to use the City of Kingman’s Colorado River contract for 18,500 acre-feet of 4th priority water, while at the same time providing Kingman with funds to develop its groundwater resources. A.R.S. § 45-2244 prescribes the uses for which this water may be used. Late in the negotiations, the Department of Interior set aside 3,500 acre-feet of the 18,500 acre feet for other uses, leaving MCWA with 3,500 acre-feet of 5th and 6th priority water, which is a less stable supply than the higher priority, 4th priority water. This 3,500 acre-feet was recently converted back to 4th priority water pursuant to provisions in the Arizona Water Settlements Agreement and would now be available to the MCWA as a permanent supply, however, A.R.S. §45-2244 A.2. limits the 3,500 acre-feet to industrial uses. Industrial uses are defined in A.R.S. §45-2201 (8) as a “nonagricultural use of water not supplied by a city, town or private water company, including animal industry use as defined in § 45-402.”

Since MCWA’s formation in 1996, it has not received a single request for water for an industrial use. During that same time frame, MCWA’s members have sought additional water for municipal purposes, which can include industrial uses.

The MCWA Board voted unanimously to seek this legislation at its meeting held September 25, 2007.

Issues:

This legislation would result in additional water for municipal as well as industrial uses. It would provide the City of Kingman with additional funds to develop its groundwater resources.

Status

HB 2132 was heard in the House Water and Agriculture Committee on Thursday, February 7 and passed unanimously, unamended. Community (LHC and BHC) representatives spoke on behalf of the bill.

HB 2132 was heard in the House Counties, Municipalities and Military Affairs Committee on February 12. Rep.McLain testified in support of the bill and reiterated that the Mohave County Water Authority had never received a request to use the 3,500 acre-foot Colorado River allocation for an industrial purpose. The bill passed unanimously.

HB 2132 was heard in the Senate Natural Resources and Rural Affairs Committee on March 19. LHC representatives testified in support of the bill, as did one of the Mohave County supervisors. Another member of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors testified in opposition to the legislation, expressing concern that the communities’ economies would suffer if water were not available to support industry needs. It was pointed out that the legislation did not limit the use of the water strictly to municipal purposes. The water could be used for municipal and industrial purposes.

SB1449~Minors, Blood Donors

Tomorrow in the House Health Committee, SB 1449, blood donors, will be heard. The American Red Cross supports thh

SB 1449 recently passed the Senate by a vote of 24-1 and seeks to clarify existing statute relating to blood donations and lowers the blood donor age to include 16 and 17 year-old minors with written parental consent.

Background

Nationally and in Arizona, there is a need for additional blood donor collections in order to provide our hospitals with the necessary blood supplies they need to operate efficiently. Today, the majority of American Red Cross Blood Services regions operate with less than one day’s supply of blood.

Due to age, previously eligible donors often become unable to donate and may become blood recipients themselves. Continuing to grow a healthy donor base will greatly assist in meeting the needs of Arizona’s patients. Furthermore, being eligible to donate is an important opportunity to expose young people to the benefits of a lifetime of community service through blood donation. The Red Cross views the requirement of parental consent for minor donors a vital tool in educating parents and their children on the importance of blood donation as an important civic duty.

Collection of blood donations from 16-year olds has proven to be a safe, acceptable practice and 16 states have adopted this as their minimum donation age. Additionally, legislation is being prepared or pending in the states of Kentucky, Georgia, Minnesota, Michigan, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin to enable blood donations from 16-year olds.

BlueStatePrison

BlueStatePrison has a post about California lawmakers proposing a similar bill to HB 2678 ~Drug Testing;Welfare Recipients. This measure, which I co-sponsored, would require all welfare applicants to be drug tested before receiving benefits.

ALCOHOL USE #1 CONTRIBUTING FACTOR IN BOATING FATALITIES

According to the most recent U.S. Coast Guard statistics alcohol use is ranked number one as a contributing factor in fatal boating accidents in the United States. There were 133 alcohol use related boating fatalities in 2006 (latest statistics available) this is more than doubles the second highest ranking contributing factor; hazardous waters which contributed to 63 boating fatalities. Operator inattention ranked third with 51 fatalities.

What is alarming is that statistics show that responsible boaters can take a few simple steps to prevent most serious problems while on the water:

• Always wear a lifejacket since even though the factors listed above contribute to boating fatalities, ultimately drowning is the cause of death by far. Wearing a lifejacket alone will substantially reduce the likelihood a boating accident will result in a fatality.
• Take a boating safety class
• Avoid alcohol or drugs while boating

The Coast Guard Auxiliary provides instruction to boaters at all levels, from the fundamental to the advanced. The courses are taught by experienced and knowledgeable instructors committed to the highest standards of the U.S. Coast Guard. For more information about Coast Guard Auxiliary safety classes please visit http://nws.cgaux.org/visitors/pe_visitor/index.html.

For more boating accident statistics visit the U.S. Coast Guard’s Office of Boating Safety website at http://www.uscgboating.org/

The U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary is the uniformed civilian component of the United States Coast Guard. Created by an Act of Congress in 1939, the Auxiliary directly supports the Coast Guard in all missions, except military and direct law enforcement actions. The Coast Guard’s motto is SEMPER PARATUS (ALWAYS READY). The Coast Guard Auxiliary is an integral part of the United Sates Coast Guard.

Hunting ~ A Constitutional Right?

Some state lawmakers want to make the ability to hunt and fish a constitutional right in hopes of keeping their colleagues - and voters - from deciding that people shouldn't be killing certain animals. They have sponsored House Concurrent Resolution 2037 , which amends the Arizona Constitution to ensure the right of Arizona citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game animals.

What say you? Do you see your freedom to hunt and fish as a constitutional right? Do we need to go this far to protect this right? Please, discuss amongst yourselves and let me know your thoughts!

Bad Behavior at Bullhead City Bar

8 Illegal Immigrants Arrested at Bullhead City Bar Serving Minors!

Northwest Arizona Watershed Council Meeting

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 2008
3 PM TO 5:00 PM

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION OFFICE
101 EAST BEALE,
KINGMAN, ARIZONA

AGENDA ITEMS:

1. Welcome and Introductions – Elno Roundy, Chairman
2. News from Arizona Department of Water Resources – John Fortune, ADWR
3. News from Mohave County – Kevin Davidson, Planning and Zoning Dept.
4. News from City of Kingman – Dean Wolslagel
5. News from Cooperative Extension – Aline Parker
6. News from Bureau of Land Management – Paul Hobbs
7. Developing a Water Fact Sheet for the Sacramento Aquifer – Elno Roundy
8. Drugs in our Water?– Discussion – Earl Engelhardt **
9. Watershed Council Website – Discussion – Denise Bensusan
10. Any other water topic – open discussion

Meeting Sponsored by: Arizona Department of Water Resources

**Just a little FYI...several years ago, I sponsored and the Governor signed into law, a bill that would allow the recycling of unused prescription medications. I was motivated to sponsor this legislation for severalreasons including lessening the contamination of our water when disposing ofunused meds. See A.R.S. 32-1909.

What the Heck?

Came across these photos that must have been taken sometime in 2004. Wow!

HCM 2003 ~ Opposing a North American Union

Sponsors: Rep. Biggs, Rep. Burges, Rep. Groe

HCM 2003 asks Congress to support House Concurrent Resolution (H.C.R.) 40 and not facilitate or promote a North American Union.

History

H.C.R. 40 was introduced in Congress by Congressman Virgil Goode of Virginia. H.C.R. 40 resolves that:

· The United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA Superhighway System;

· the United States should not enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and

· the President of the US should indicate strong opposition to these or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States.

Provisions of HCM 2003:

· Asks that Congress support H.C.R. 40 or take other immediate action to withdraw the US from the SPP and involvement in NAFTA.

· Asks Congress to take action to withdraw the US from involvement in any activity that seeks to advance, authorize, fund or in any way promote a North American Union.

· Directs the Arizona Secretary of State to transmit copies to the President of the US, the President of the US Senate, the Speaker of the US House of Representatives and each member of Congress from Arizona.


This is the bill, the "postcard to Congress" that is generating so much hate mail to my colleagues who did not support the bill. Folks, settle down...it is just a postcard.

http://www.wearechangeaz.com/

Abusive Constituent Mail & My Response

I honestly do not know how to begin this post other than to tell say that I sit here, for probably the third night this week, greatly disturbed over the amount of rude, abusive, threatening email from angry constituents that has filled my inbox and those of my colleagues. All who know me know that I love communicating with constituents and welcome the opportunity to hear differing viewpoints but a surprising amount of recent emails have been outrageous!

The email that spurred this post. the straw that broke the camel's (or elephant's) back was not directed to me but was an email sent to a colleague. The author of the email forwarded a copy to me and to a large number of media persons/outlets. I was shocked when I read the email and pray that the author, a patriot and a passionate American realizes his mistake and makes amends. What follows is my response, not directly to the author (I was asked not to contact him) but to another constituent addressing the same legislation/legislator.


I understand passion and admire persistence, even accept anger expressed in email communications but there is never, in my opinion, an excuse for rudeness or emotional abuse. Unfortunately many people do not realize that these type of emails almost always backfire. So many decisions made by government officials affect our daily life, it is easy to let emotions get out of control but proper thought must be given when communicating by email.

The effect of the inappropriate email is misunderstood...the abusive letters do not hurt, the threats do not motivate us to change our mind. Hardly any weight is given to these type letters since there is no sense of decorum. (I know this as I have been on the receiving end of many of these also, for a variety of votes.) It is possible to disagree with dignity and as I mentioned before, even possible to express extreme anger without being over-the-top rude. In fact, I think that you and I will probably end up disagreeing on this very subject but you and I will more than likely continue to engage each other despite disagreeing because we communicate without bashing each other, name calling or other disrespectful actions. Now, that being said, you and others may not have an ounce of respect for "Representative ABC". That is your choice and I am not attempting to change you mind, I am just saying that their ought to be given a bit of respect for the office. Am I making sense?

I commend you for taking the time to engage in the process but I beg you to urge your friends and colleagues to re-evaluate the effectiveness of their communications. It is so easy to hit the "delete" button when you read the first inappropriate comment...I believe the majority of my colleagues do this. it is our job to listen to our constituents...whether we agree with them or not but we do not have to take verbal or in this case, written abuse. "Representative ABC" is a reasonable, logical member who takes his/her job very seriously. If you have the opportunity to express your opinion on an issue before he/she votes, he/she will take what you say under advisement.

I find it interesting that I am "lobbying" on the behalf of "Representative ABC" as we are not close, not friends and do not work together as a rule but I must be honest in telling you that I admire him/her in that he/she is a very good representative for rural Arizona. He/She has been tireless in his/her advocacy for the residents of district XYZ and although I consider myself a bit more conservative then he/she, I can tell you that he/she is a conservative republican.

I appreciate you listening to me and hearing me out. Honestly, the disgustingly inappropriate emails we receive just sap our energy when for the most part, no matter how misguided we are or appear to be we believe we are doing the right thing...standing up for what is right. As blessed as we are to have this honor and serve in this capacity, just fighting the democrats day is and day out is difficult and depressing…the job sometimes appears hopeless and sucks the life out of you. Evil is everywhere here and people like you, who are gracious and take the time to say thanks are few and far between.. There is tremendous reward for doing what is right, whether it is acknowledged or not but there is never respite from the criticism…I believe even that can be weathered when it does not constitute abuse.

Most sincerely and with great respect,
RepGroe

No Cash? Big Problem!

Treasurer: State's No-Cash Date Moving Forward
March 13th, 2008 @ 6:23pm
by Associated Press

PHOENIX (AP) _ The state's worsening revenue shortfall means the general fund will run out of cash it can legally spend earlier than the previous estimate of late May.

State Treasurer Dean Martin said his office is fine-tuning its calculations and expects to project a new no-cash date by next week. But he said the increased size of the current fiscal year's estimated shortfall _ to $1.2 billion currently from $970 million most recently _ likely moves up the date when there's no cash in the general fund to early May or even late April. That adds to pressure on legislative leaders who have yet to hammer out a budget compromise after two months of close-door talks. Gov. Janet Napolitano joined the talks this week.

Martin said the state still would have money in other accounts but that legislative authorization would be needed to spend those dollars to pay the regular expenses of state government. "The statues never contemplate a scenario where the appropriations don't match the revenue,'' he said. One possible source of cash would be the state Budget Stabilization Fund, a reserve now holding approximately $700 million. Tapping that $700 million rainy day fund could get the state "a few more weeks down the road,'' Martin said.

Tax collections have been hammered by the poor economy, especially in housing and consumer spending, and Martin said he saw dramatic drops in the state's cash on hand in January and February. "These are the months that we're normally accumulating cash. It's not happening,'' he said.

The Good, Bad, & The Ugly

Arizona Federation of Taxpayer's post details Tuesday's vote on the $250 Million Dollar Property Tax returning next year includes a list of the House Representatives who voted to repeal the tax and who voted against the bill. Both Representative McLain and I supported this legislation and I am confident that when Senator Gould has the opportunity to vote, he too will vote "YES".

T.G. I. F....Oh Wait

Caffeine IV, STAT!

After an exhausting, emotionally draining (listened to testimony from family members of victims of 9/11 and their opinions on the Arizona 9/11 Memorial), & unexpectedly long work day yesturday, I am in great need of refreshing.

Wednesday started out with my favorite committee mtg, Health (ugh!), followed by a lunch mtg with the folks from the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, Floor, Third Read, and an eight-hour Appropriations Committee meeting. I left for work at 7:00am and returned home after 10:00pm!

Today, no Water and Agriculture Committee mtg but instead, Republican Caucus at 10:15 am. Floor at 1:00 where we have several Third Reads and eight COW Calendars, then a special Appropriations meeting that looks to be lengthy as there is a controversial ELL-related bill on the agenda.

Because of the long day, I am going to be unable to attend the London Bridge Friends of the NRA Banquet taking place at Shugrue's in Lake Havasu City this evening. Although I attempt to attend this event every year, I have yet to make the celebration as they take place on a weeknight during session. Sorry LB Friends of the NRA but KUDOS to all you do!

Note to self: Describe, in future blog post, how the committee meeting was derailed by a Minister representing United Methodist Church and Valley Interfaith Project. Testimony from this "gentleman" blindsided the entire committee membership.

Sheriff Joe's Boxers

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is selling his famous pink boxers and a portion of the proceeds will benefit the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and the sheriff's posse patrols.

Sheriff Joe dyed the boxers pink in 1995 to keep the inmates from stealing them, but they're still a hot item. To buy a pair of these boxers, call (602) 876-1895.

AZ House Votes to Repeal Statewide Property Tax

House Speaker Jim Weiers (R-10)
News Release
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

House backs homeowners with repeal of property tax

(State Capitol, Phoenix) – The Arizona House today helped ensure homeowners in the state avoid a $250 million tax increase.

The House passed HB2220, which permanently repeals the statewide property tax.

Two years ago, the Legislature suspended the property tax for three years. The tax reappears if the Legislature takes no action this year. The bill, sponsored by House Speaker Jim Weiers, now moves to the Senate.

“While this bill helps our struggling economy by eliminating the tax on businesses, it is also for the small guy – by keeping Arizona families in their homes,” Weiers, R-Phoenix, said. “I do not want to see our homeowners burdened by this massive tax increase.”

Without action, property owners will see the tax return in January. At a time when foreclosures in Arizona are skyrocketing, this bill brings a little relief, Weiers said.

House Approves Ultimate Fighting (It's not what you think.)

News Release
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Ultimate Fighting bill gets Ultimate House approval

(State Capitol, Phoenix) – Fans of Ultimate Fighting Champions are one step closer to seeing the popular sport coming to Arizona.

The House passed HB2834 Tuesday, which directs the Arizona Boxing Commission to adopt a set of rules that would permit unarmed combat contests to take place in the state.

“This sport is undeniably the fastest growing sport in the nation and we are unable to host these action-packed events,” said bill sponsor Rep. Jonathan Paton, R-Tucson. “We have turned away this economic development opportunity for too long. It is time to give Arizona fans a chance to see the action live.”

Jiu-jitsu, judo, karate and wrestling are among the forms of combat that would be sanctioned under the rules adopted by the boxing commission.

The bill moves to the Senate for consideration.

House Passes Day Laborers Restrictions

News Release

Tuesday, March 11, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Kavanagh bill addresses growing day labor problems

(State Capitol, Phoenix) – Day laborers would be banned from standing on the side of the road seeking jobs under a bill passed by the House Tuesday.

HB2412 bans day laborers from standing on the side of the road, flagging down passing vehicles and helping to create a traffic and safety problem. Day laborers have been congregating in increasingly larger groups along streets, in parking lots, on sidewalks and on lawns.

“Too many people have decided that the best place to find work is along the roadside,” Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, said. “We cannot ignore the real nuisance and safety problems they create.”

They also stand in front of businesses, impeding regular commerce, Kavanagh said.

“These workers obstruct our streets and sidewalks while attempting to solicit work and prospective employers stop on the side of the road,” Kavanagh said. “Communities don’t need this kind of disruption.”

The bill now moves to the Senate for consideration.

House Republican Caucus Calendar for 3/13

This is the Caucus Calendar for tomorrow. Remember that caucus is an opportunity for the entire body of republican members in the House to gather and discuss bills that are coming up for third read in the near future. If you would like further details on any of these bills please visit the www.azleg.gov website and plug the bill number in the upper right hand corner. As always, you can shoot me an email for further information or clarification. More than likely, we will be voting on these bills tomorrow (3/13) or Monday (3/17).

Bill Number Short Title Committee Date Action

HB 2154 county plans; major amendments
SPONSOR: PATON CMMA 1/29 DP (10-0-0-0-0)

HB 2672 small installment loan act
SPONSOR: BIGGS COM 2/27 DPA (6-1-0-3-0)

HB 2557 schools; standards; PE; art; music
SPONSOR: ANDERSON ED 2/20 DPA (8-1-0-1-0)

HB 2696 schools; American competitiveness project fund
SPONSOR: SCHAPIRA ED 3/5 DPA (7-1-1-1-0)

HB 2141 WA S/E: water supply status; disclosure
SPONSOR: ABLESER ENV 3/5 DPA/SE (10-0-0-0-0)

HB 2151 GOV S/E: Iran; public fund divestment
SPONSOR: PATON GOV 3/4 DPA/SE (8-0-0-0-0)

HB 2478 redaction orders; expiration; notice; funds
SPONSOR: ADAMS GOV 2/12 DPA (6-1-0-1-0)

HB 2496 HED S/E: state board for community colleges
SPONSOR: BURNS J HED 2/26 DPA/SE (8-0-0-2-0)

HB 2131 homeowners' associations; registration; disclosure
SPONSOR: CAMPBELL CH HSPR 1/28 DPA (9-0-0-1-0)

HB 2451 election security provisions
SPONSOR: REAGAN JUD 2/21 DP (8-0-0-2-0)

HB 2660 joint; several liability; criminal offenses
SPONSOR: NICHOLS JUD 2/14 DP (9-1-0-0-0)

HB 2740 graffiti; parent responsibility
SPONSOR: CAMPBELL CH JUD 3/6 DPA (7-2-0-1-0)

HB 2254 fingerprinting board; good cause exceptions
SPONSOR: WEIERS JP NRPS 2/20 DPA (8-0-0-2-0)

HB 2381 emergency telecommunication services; admin costs
SPONSOR: WEIERS JP NRPS 2/6 DP (10-0-0-0-0)

HB 2511 oil and gas; shut-in royalty
SPONSOR: KONOPNICKI NRPS 2/20 DP (8-0-0-2-0)

HB 2753 traffic citations; payments; reinstatement fees
SPONSOR: MIRANDA B NRPS 3/5 DP (7-0-0-3-0)

HB 2116 CORP; joinders; credited service
SPONSOR: MCCLURE PIR 2/18 DPA (7-0-0-3-0)

HB 2098 corporate tax credit; tuition organizations
SPONSOR: YARBROUGH WM 1/17 DP (6-3-0-1-0)

HB 2100 tax credits; withholding tax reduction
SPONSOR: YARBROUGH WM 2/4 DPA (6-3-0-1-0)

HB 2339 I didn't pay enough fund
SPONSOR: BURGES WM 2/18 DP (5-4-0-1-0)

Constituent Mail ~ HB 2677 Real ID Act; Implementation Prohibited

HB 2677 prohibits Arizona from participating in the Federal REAL ID Act of 2005 (REAL ID).

Below is an email in support of this bill:

Greetings Everyone:

Regardless of whether or not you live in Arizona . The Real ID ACT if implemented, will affect you . Therefore we need everyone all over the country to write to the House members in Arizona and encourage them to support HB2677. If we fail , your information including medical, financial, the number of weapons registered to you , number of vehicles and what they are, your religious affiliations will ultimately be available to groups, agencies, foreign governments. If it pertains to you it will be available, whether you like it or not. Crazy you say? Well no, here is a fact: the institution that will be compiling the data is a international Company named the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators(AAMVA).

So lets kill this REAL ID bill by supporting HB 2677 in the state of Arizona.

Constituent Mail ~ HB 2573 off-highway vehicles; user fee

House Bill 2573 creates an off-highway vehicle user indicia, off-highway vehicle equipment requirements and off-highway vehicle operating regulations.

I voted "NO" on this bill for a variety of reasons (see recent post titled "Passage of HB 2573 is Criminal") and continue to work towards this bills demise. Below is an email from a constituent opposing this bill:

Thank you for trying to do the right thing by voting no on HB 2753. The law is absurd, and adding another layer of bureaucracy is equally absurd.

Families who have these vehicles I think for the most part try and protect the environment. I would go for more education on the environment and how to protect it; what to do and not do while using these vehicles. Your concern on the law itself is right on, as far as being not defining and making it a class 3-misdemeanor. I don’t know what it is with law makers, you pass laws and think that everyone is going to understand and obey them. When you try to pass a law such as this one that is opened to so much interpretation from the officers, attorneys’ and judges then the public becomes the big looser. I seriously think Arizona Game & Fish see the dollars being brought in more than anything else.

Thank you for seeing that and doing what you could do to stop it by voting “nay.”

HB 2389 ~ Misconduct Involving Weapons; Means; Transportation

From the Arizona Citizens Defense League:

HB 2389 would make changes to Arizona law regarding carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle. Current law states that, without a concealed weapons (CCW) permit, it is permissible to carry a weapon or weapons ".in a case, holster, scabbard, pack or luggage that is carried within a means of transportation or within a storage compartment, map pocket, trunk or glove compartment of a means of transportation."

Unfortunately, in 1994 an Arizona Appellate court decision determined that "within a means of transportation" meant it must be obvious under ordinary observation to someone outside the vehicle that there is a weapon inside the vehicle. This created conflicts interpreting the statute. As a result:

. Wearing a holstered firearm within a vehicle = concealed carry, requiring a CCW permit. But, that same holstered firearm in a map pocket, trunk or glove compartment, equally accessible by a vehicle's occupants, does not require a CCW permit.

. Possessing a concealed weapons permit and being armed may put other occupants in the vehicle, who do not possess a CCW permit, at risk of arrest because of their proximity to your firearm. Yet, if that same weapon were in a map pocket, trunk or glove compartment accessible by all the vehicle's occupants, no crime is committed.

The proposed language clarifies that it permissible to carry a weapon, visibly or concealed, anywhere within a means of transportation, excluding public transit. Much like the states of New Mexico and Texas, it would be legal for any law abiding citizen to carry anywhere inside a vehicle without the need of a permit, just like it currently is inside their own home or business, eliminating the confusing hodgepodge of lawful and unlawful places currently listed in statute. This would benefit both law enforcement and the law-abiding, making the law clear and rational, not subject to confusing roadside interpretations.

Dave Kopp
President
Arizona Citizens Defense League
P.O. Box 10325
Glendale, AZ 85318
Email: president@azcdl.org
Web site: http://www.azcdl.org/
Phone/Fax: 623-594-8521
Mobile: 623-670-3516

Education Bills on Third Read

Today, there are a number of key education bills up for third read.

HB 2085 (scholarships; section 504 plan pupils)
This bill would expand the special education voucher to Section 504 plan students.

HB 2286 (school district boards; training)
This bill would require prospective school district governing board members to complete six hours of training.

HB 2560 (school districts; compliance; withholding monies)
This bill would allow up to 10% to be withheld from a district if it is deemed not in compliance with 15-341 (mandatory board duties), Chapter 5 (employment issues), and Chapter 7 (curriculum)

HB 2567 (school distrct boards; family members)
This bill would prospectively prohibit family members and married persons to serve on the same school district governing board if it is a three-member board.

Governor Vetos Spending Freeze ~ Veto Letter on HB 2857

Gov. Janet Napolitano has vetoed a spending freeze approved last week by the Legislature that would have prevented state agencies from spending about $580 million already assigned to them.

Less Bruising Than What I Do Now

League seeks roller derby queens

Senta Scarborough
The Arizona RepublicMar. 11, 2008 08:40 AM

Wanted: Women with a high tolerance for pain who are willing to bond with other girls from all walks of life and love to roller skate.And if you are neither shy nor afraid of breaking some bones in a brawl, then the Arizona Derby Dames, an all female roller-derby league, is looking for some "fresh meat" like you.

The league is holding try-outs Thursday at 7:30 p.m. at Mesa Skateland, 7 E. Southern Ave. Women must be at least 18 to try out. Bring $5 to enter, as well as water and additional money to rent skates, if needed.

AZ Free Enterprise Club Press Release

Gov. Napolitano Sets Stage for Property Tax Increase
Recent comments conflict with “no tax increase” commitment

Phoenix, AZ – The Arizona Free Enterprise Club, a pro-economic growth advocacy group, today called on lawmakers to pass the permanent repeal of the state equalization rate, which, if not passed, will increase taxes on all Arizona taxpayers next year by about $250 million.

According to The Arizona Republic, Gov. Napolitano told an audience of educators that legislative efforts to prevent this tax increase are misguided because the state faces billions in deficits.

“The governor’s support for this tax increase is a direct departure from what she wrote in her 2009 budget plan, where she pledged not to raise taxes,” said Steve Voeller, president of the Club.

In trying to sell the tax increase, the governor told the group that the tax equates to “two lattes a year.”

“Points should be deducted for unoriginality,” Voeller said. “When politicians justify tax increases by calculating them as lattes or steak dinners, they imply that we can’t figure out what’s really going on.”

“Property tax increases affect everyone, including those who can’t afford to drink lattes in the first place.”
“Property taxes continue to rise as valuations fall, so whether it’s one, two or 200 lattes, tax increases in today’s market will hurt everyone’s bottom line.”

“This is especially perplexing since the governor recently argued that people need help with their rising adjustable rate mortgages. Wouldn’t one way to do that include preventing property taxes from going up?”

Today's Third Read Calendar

There is a lengthy Third Read Calendar scheduled for today and, I believe two COW calendars. With 40 bills to Third Read, I am not going to list them all here but will mention that some of them are a bit controversial such as:

• HB2412 criminal trespass; day laborers
• HB2483 ignition strength of cigarettes; regulation
• HB2588 lottery game; energy efficient schools
• HB2847 autism; covered benefit denial prohibited
• HCM2003 opposing a North American Union

Leading the Pach...

The latest Pachyderm rankings are posted and once again, yours truly places in the highest category as a Reagan Republican with a perfect score of 100!

Interesting Idea...What Say You?

Group to offer nation's 10 worst teachers $10,000 to quite their careers! Why stop with teachers? Lets expand the program...any suggestions? I'm sure you have a few. Don't play shy now.

Passage of HB 2573 is Criminal!!

This post is a copy of a response to a heated email I received from an angry constituent when he learned of my "No" vote on HB 2573.

I stand by my decision to vote against this bill (HB 2573) and will continue to do all that I can to make sure this bill never sees the light of day. It is unfortunate that you did not call me as I requested. I am extremely confident that I would have made myself clear when explaining why Jerry Weiers and all who voted for this bill did the hunters, sportsman, and nature-lovers a grave disservice by supporting this horrid piece of legislation. I do not think that the bill would have had as much support if Jerry Weiers did not mislead other legislators by telling them that the NRA was going to “weight” the bill & use it on their legislative scorecard. I found this to be untrue when I spoke with an NRA rep who was aware of the false information being spread by Mr. Weiers.

While I do have my doubts that licensing fees generated will actually be used for their intended purposes, I can live with this portion of the bill. I have two ATVs and ride regularly around LHC, both on and off road with friends and family and have little qualms about paying these fees and applaud their purpose. If Jerry Weiers bill stopped there, more than likely, I would have voted yes. But, Weiers bill venture far into dangerous territory and it is unconscionable my colleagues voted for its passage.

The text of the bill states that criminal action includes:
Damage to the environment: excessive pollution of air, water, or land.
Abuse of the watershed, cultural or natural resources.
Impairment of plant or animal life.

In another portion of the bill, the text includes:
Damage to:
Wildlife habitat
Riparian Areas
Cultural or Natural Resources
Property or Improvements

Now, this sounds great, right? I agree that it does. We need to preserve our beautiful desert landscape, our natural resources, the flora and fauna. I cannot argue that but...what constitutes damage? What constitutes abuse of a watershed? When, as a lawmaker, I vet bills as great as they sound and as much as I agree with the bill's intent I must ask questions. One of the questions almost always asked is "are the terms defined?" Will a sportsman who is out enjoying a ride be able to ascertain if he/she is breaking the law? Under the provisions of this bill, I do not think so. No one I spoke with could. Even testimony from Game and Fish representatives brought to light that they could not define these terms but that they "would know it when they see it."

The enforcement of this bill would be entirely too subjective for me, especially when times are tight and every agency budget is fighting for cash. I was elected to protect the rights of citizens. This bill undermines those rights by not providing enough information so that law abiding citizens can continue to remain law abiding citizens. I can only imagine when budget times continue to tighten that enforcement agencies will step up efforts to ticket & fine unsuspecting, otherwise upstanding individuals in order to pad their budget. I will not let that happen. You find that disappointing? I am disappointed you think so.

D***n, I hope that you can remember the reality that my name is on almost every pro-2nd Amendment piece of legislation sponsored since I took office in 2004. I am an NRA member with an A ranking as a legislator, a member of Arizona State Rifle & Pistol Association, I believe that I am even a member (or have been in the recent past) of the M%# S&*^%n Club. If you let one vote sway you, if other club members let this vote sway them, I regret that but so be it. I did not vote no on this bill arbitrarily but because that, although there is some good there is too much bad. I will regret losing your support but will not regret voting my conscious.

Most sincerely,
RepGroe

Universal Health Care Coverage Debate

Note: I had this post saved as a draft but was inspired to post it when I read the latest Arizona Republican Party press release.

I am going to claw my eyes out one of these days!

Every Wednesday morning from 9:00 to at least 11:00 am (today it was even later) I sit through a House Health Committee as one of six republican members. I despise this committee assignment since the majority of bills heard in this committee are stinkers. Even the Republican sponsored bills for the most part, focus expanding current government programs that offer free services or further regulation.

Today, in addition to a slew of unnecessary bills we are hearing but not voting on House Minority Leader Representative Phil Lopes (D) Universal Health Care proposal! Chairman Stump is definetly taking a risk by hearing this bill as once a bill has a hearing, any standing committee can vote on the bill without having another hearing per House rules. With committe membership skewed so that almost any bill passes out of committee, I question this move.

I find Representative Lopes Universal Health Care bill outrageous on several levels and offer these comments:

1. We are in the middle of a tremendous budget crisis with an ever-increasing shortfall. State Treasurer Dean Martin has said on several occasions that the state's money runs out in May. What is not clear about this picture Representative Lopes?
2. This would be an Arizona-specific program. Can you imagine the huge numbers of people who would flock to Arizona if this bill passed? You think we have grid-lock on our roads now, over-crowded classrooms, etc...just wait.
3. As P.J. O'Rourke famously said, "If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free." I have yet to learn about a government program that has remained uncontaminated, uncorrupted and I cannot fathom that people think government intervention is a viable solution.
4. Rep Lopes bill mandates health care coverage for all Arizona residents. This is his answer? More mandates? Oy vey!

Constituent Mail

When I communicate electronically I attempt to couch the vital parts of my message with words and/or phrases that hint to my tone. Maybe this helps, maybe and more than likely, I am fooling myself. The writer of this email employs no such aid and although, I do not need well-written, formal, or flowery emails, it does help me know where you are coming from if you provide a few clues.

Since our property value has decreased, shouldn't our taxes decrease? Did you understand the Notice of Value you received from the county assessor? Did you know you cannot do anything about your 2008 taxes due in Oct of 2008. You had to appeal 2008 taxes in JANUARY OF 2007. If you ask the assessor office about it they will tell you we only follow the rules given to us by the lawmakers who spend your tax dollars. Now is the time you can appeal your 2009 taxes due in Oct 2009. Senator Gould promised us a property tax relief bill which would lower our property taxes. Where is it?

BTW, the tax relief bill Senator Gould & I sponsored was held by Senate Finance Chair, Senator Jim Warring. You can read about it by clicking the title of this post.

Keep Your Fingers Crossed...

but don't hold your breath.

What does it mean to fiscal conservatives like myself when both the Republican-led House and Senate, who can't pass a budget out of either House, invite the Governor to join in the negotiations? I hope I don't have the answer to that question.

Polluters Beware!

The Vatican adds 7 new deadly sins including being obscenely rich (no worries there) and causing social injustice (no comments from the peanut gallery).

SLIF~What in the world is SLIF?

Arizona’s State Lake Improvement Fund (SLIF) program was established in 1960 by the Arizona State Legislature to assist state and local units of government to fund projects on waters where boats are permitted.

SLIF revenues are generated from a percentage of the state motor vehicle fuel taxes attributed to watercraft and motorized watercraft license taxes paid at the time of boat registration, and interest income on the fund. Funded projects include water-based recreation amenities such as boat launch ramps, restrooms, and campgrounds, as well as lake construction or improvement, and law enforcement watercraft.

The SLIF program is administered through a competitive grant process by the Arizona State Parks Board. Applications are evaluated against a rating criterion, which is based on a statewide survey of lake recreational needs and documentation of local needs and priorities. Applications are accepted annually in December, followed by awards by the Parks Board in September. The Legislature’s Joint Committee on Capital Review* (JCCR)reviews the awarded projects before State Parks can enter into the participant agreements obligating the funds.

* I am a member of this committee.

Monday Morning

Sorry for the lack of posts lately. My Mother-in-law had a heart attack early Friday morning so F & I drove into California unexpectedly. RG is now, this moment undergoing a heart cath at Loma Linda Medical with FG waiting at her bedside. Prayers please.

I drove in from CA late last night and am preparing for a long day at work. There are many bills on the Third Read Calendar for today but I do not know what the day holds. Last week we did not vote on any of bills scheduled for third read so we will see what happens when we go to Floor at 1:00 this afternoon.

I will attempt to post later on today if I have time after working on the content changes to my website, www.trishgroe.com.

Later!

Upcoming Mohave Republican Forum

March 11, 2008 Meeting

Assessor and Treasurer Candidates to Speak at Forum

Mohave Republican Forum
5:30 PM Tuesday, March 13, 2008
Kingman Elk's Lodge

Hear incumbent Mohave County Assessor, Ron Nicholson who is running for re-election and his challenger, David Smallwood as well as incumbent Mohave County Treasurer, Lee Fabrizio and his challenger, Melissa Havatone

This gathering is open to the public, with the admission charge of $10 per person including dinner.

For information, please call Shirley at 753-5183, or Richard at 692-4771, or Laurie at 753-5581.

Caucus

Tomorrow's caucus calendar is posted on the Arizona State Legislature website.

The bills on the caucus calendar are bills that have made it through their committee assignments. The Republican Caucus meets regularly on Tuesday mornings to caucus the bills that have successfully made it out of committee the previous week. This is an opportunity to ask questions of the bill's sponsor or listen to others voice their concerns regarding the proposed piece of legislation. Sometimes caucus is the first time members read a particular bill, especially if the bill did not come through any of the committees on which they sit. With all of the bad bills floating around the legislature, I attempt to familiarize myself with bills before they get to caucus so that I have a chance to lobby against them, perhaps "killing" them before they see the light of day. After a bill is caucused, the bills are COW'd ( brought before the entire body of the House or Senate in Committee of the Whole), then voted on in Third Read.

The caucus calendar is a good calendar to follow as it is basically a great "heads-up" on what we are getting ready to vote on in with-in the next day or so. If you keep an eye on the caucus calendar, you will have time to shoot-off an email or make a phone call in support or opposition on an upcoming piece of legislation.

Kingman Republican Women's Meeting

A reminder that Tuesday, March 4th is the regular Republican Women's Club meeting at 5:30 p.m. at the Elks Lodge in Kingman.

This organization is made up of some fantastic women who never cease to amaze me with their generosity and spirit! They are active in their community and leaders in the Arizona republican party. They are the movers and the shakers, getting a lot done and having a darn good time doing it! If you have not attended one of their meetings, get to it and let them know that I sent you. You will have a great time, make new friends, learn something new and be actively supporting the Republican party and the Republican Party Platform by doing so.

The Grades are In

B-

Average.

The Pew Center recently completed it's 2008 50 States Report and Arizona takes home a B-. The report examines and measures four key areas in state government - money, people, infrastructure and information. No surprising revelations in this report. Easy read if you are interested.

HB 2678 ~Drug Testing;Welfare Recipients

This measure, which I co-sponsored, would require all welfare applicants to be drug tested before receiving benefits. Critics of the bill argue that the program would be too costly to implement but my the majority of colleagues and I predict a net savings will be realized due to the number of people disqualified.

HB2678 will be heard in the House Appropriations committee this Wednesday.

HB 2692 ~ Taxpayer Information Ruling

UPDATE: This bill passed out of the House today and heads to the Senate to begin the process there.

ATRA SUPPORTS HB2692 which maintains a taxpayer’s right to seek tax guidance from the Department of Revenue anonymously. (ATRA stands for Arizona Tax Research Association. Their website is http://www.arizonatax.org)

Basis for ATRA’s Support:

HB2692 continues the practice of allowing taxpayers to request tax guidance anonymously by means of a taxpayer information ruling (TIR) through the taxpayer’s representative. If a TIR is requested, the taxpayer representative is required to provide the same level of information that is required under a PTR. A taxpayer that discloses its identity prior to the publication date of the TIR is provided the same level of protection as a PTR, which is waiver of tax, penalty, and interest for periods prior to revocation or modification of the ruling if DOR changes its position. If the taxpayer chooses to remain anonymous, the ruling is not binding on DOR for abatement of tax, penalty, and interest.

If the taxpayer believes that its identity can be determined by publication of either a PTR or TIR despite redaction, the taxpayer may request that the ruling not be published at the time of its request for a PTR or TIR. If DOR determines that the ruling should be published, the taxpayer may withdraw its ruling request at that time and DOR is not to proceed with a ruling.

Wonderful (Windy) Weekend

What a wonderful weekend in Lake Havasu City! Started Saturday off right, with a well-attended meeting of the Lake Havasu Republican Forum. BHC Attorney Rick Williams, candidate for Mohave County Superior Court Judge spoke about his work experience and qualifications as a candidate. Dana Hlavac, candidate for the same position spoke at the previous meeting.

Saturday afternoon, Frank & I unexpectedly attended a going away party for members of our church that are moving out-0f-state to be nearer to grandkids (understandable) and in the process we met some new neighbors. What a delight to know that just a few streets over are some great folks who just happen to attend the same church we do and share our love for community and fellowship! While we say goodbye to our friends Randy and Jessica we say hello to our new friends and neighbors Joyce and Cody!

Later on that same evening we attended a smashing dinner hosted by the H***l's~tireless Republicans who opened up their beautiful home to Lake Havasu Precinct Committee people so that we could have the opportunity to see and say hello to one another in a relaxed atmosphere. The weather was perfect (near 80's) as we dined under the stars, enjoying the delicious dinner (loved the Thai Vegetable Salad) and decadent desserts so tempting and abundant. DH energized the crowd as he spoke, urging us to continue to fight for our precious republican platform and rally behind the republican nominee. Senator Gould echoed these sentiments.

Sunday morning the winds kicked up and the "Community Celebration" church service, tail gate party and BBQ that was to be held in a large tent at the Sweetwater property had to be moved at the last minute back to the church. As the tent sides flapped and folding chairs toppled, the local firefighters declared the tent unsafe. What a scramble! Phone calls and text messages flew and as the news spread the Calvary Baptist church and parking lot filled to capacity. We did celebrate as we listened and learned how the various outreach programs have impacted the community by feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless, and reaching countless individuals through CBC's participation in various Main Street events. After the jam-packed service the crowd lined up for a bountiful buffet of pizza, sandwiches, nachos, an assortment of homemade chilis, hotdogs and hamburgers. What a smorgasbord! As the day progressed, my great friend Bonnie (Hi Bonnie!) collected signatures for my re-election campaign, continuing to stun me with her grace and determination!

F&I are back now in Phoenix, refreshed and renewed because of our wonderful community and all who make Lake Havasu City a great place to call home!

HB 2769 and SB 1099 ~ Ban on Partial-Birth Abortion

Both the Senate and House gave tentative approval to a state ban on partial-birth abortion last week. You can read more about the bill’s progress in the Arizona Daily Star. A final vote in both houses could happen as early as next week.

UPDATE: HB 2769 passed out of the House today (along party lines) and heads to the Senate to begin the process there.

F.Y.I. ~ The Cost of a Proposal

To find out the potential estimated cost of a bill (fiscal note) visit the JLBC's webpage dedicated to this session's bills and their fiscal note.

JLBC fiscal notes usually use the "static" impact model as opposed to the "dynamic" impact model and because of this, can be at times, insufficient or incomplete in their projections. The static approach of evaluation the fiscal impact of a bill may be over or under estimated by ignoring the economic effects triggered by the bill.

JLBC ~ What's New?

Check out the new information on the Joint Legislative Budget Committee's "What's New" web page that includes a February 26, 2008 presentation on State and Local Debt. Also available are the monthly fiscal highlights (low lights) and an explanation on the state appropriations limit.

AZ Auditor General's Report on Classroom Dollar Spending

The Arizona Office of the Auditor General recently released a report on the percentage of dollar spent on classroom costs. You can look up specific school districts and see how they compare to the national average. There is also information how many schools are in the district, the number of students in said district and the district's ranking within the 239 state school districts.

Comparative information includes the student/teacher ratio, the average teacher's salary, and a teacher's average years experience.

Interesting reading from the report:

• In fiscal year 2007, Arizona’s state-wide percentage of dollars spent in the classroom decreased for the third consecutive year to 57.9 percent and remains more than 3 percentage points below the national average. More than half of the school districts’ classroom dollar percentages declined in 2007, but the biggest impact on the state average came from declines in the very large districts. With the infusion over the past several years of significant state-provided resources largely directed to the classroom, the State’s classroom dollar percentage could have been higher, but districts appear to be using these monies to supplant other monies, a violation of A.R.S. §15-977.

• Compared with the national average, Arizona districts spent a larger portion of their current dollars on student support services, plant operation and maintenance, and food service. However, on a positive note, Arizona districts spent much less on administration.

Simmering with Indignation

facing this deficit
the future before us bleak
painful cuts we have to make
so many troubling, so terribly deep

blindly borrowing against your future
she wants to grow and grow
greedy layers of government
gluttons fat and slow
spending your hard-earned money to excess
while my patience with her becomes less and less

Alright, you guessed it...tonight is amateur poetry night and, although it might hurt your ears if read aloud, it won't hurt your pocketbook

Where's the Budget?

While waiting for caucus to begin this morning I thought I would take the opportunity to post. No good news to share. With only a few days left in February and a budget crisis weighing heavily on my mind I am ashamed to say that there is no movement on the budget. The silence is deafening as focus on (terrible) bills moving forward in the process. The Appropriations committee which usually meets on Wednesdays has been cancelled this week. Appropriations Chair Russell Pearce just walked by; apparently the delay in voting on the proposed budget "fixes" is because the Senate does not have the votes. Looks like the House will continue to wait for action in the Senate as the budget problems worsen.

While Rome burns, we are reviewing over 60 bills in caucus. After we vet them I will attempt to post both the highlights and lowlights...stay tuned!

Stop the Bleeding ~ Commentary on SB1223

By Glenn Hamer

Arizona has an estimated physician shortage of over 2,200, based on 2005 findings. At 219/100,000, the physician to population ratio is well below the national average of 283/100,000. Although the number of doctors in Arizona increases each year, it's not enough to meet the demands of Arizona's growing population. In fact, every county in Arizona has been designated in part or whole as a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA).

These are troubling figures that should prompt Arizona to examine its medical environment. There is an increasing complaint among hospitals about the diminishing number of physicians willing to serve in emergency rooms. Having to assume additional medical liability is one factor that contributes to the decline in available ER physicians. A recent survey by the Arizona Medical Association showed 23 percent of physicians who do not currently take emergency department calls stated the primary reason was increased medical liability exposure.

A bill currently in the Arizona Senate would improve upon Arizona's medical liability environment by raising the burden of proof to "clear and convincing evidence" to show medical malpractice. The measure, SB 1223 introduced by Sen. Carolyn Allen, is currently working its way through the legislative process. This bill would make Arizona's liability environment more equitable for those providing emergency services. It would also stop the loss of doctors and start to replenish Arizona's supply.

In 2006, Governor Napolitano assembled the Emergency Medical Services Access Task Force to study ways to increase the number of physicians providing emergency and trauma care. The task force made numerous recommendations, including increasing the burden of proof to "clear and convincing evidence" in civil medical liability cases filed against physicians providing mandatory, emergency care. The task force said, "This reform is necessary because emergency department patients present unique challenges that make physicians less willing to assume their care, yet preserves the right of emergency patients to receive compensation in the event of clear and convincing evidence of a malpractice event."

Meeting our emergency medical needs is an issue of critical importance not only to Arizona's economic health, but its physical health. Raising the burden of proof for emergency services will improve access to emergency care for all. It would be malpractice for Arizona to ignore this issue and not initiate reforms to make Arizona ERs more attractive to doctors.

Glenn Hamer is president and CEO of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

Proposed Military and Veteran Related Bills

SB 1006 professional license extensions; military members
Prohibits the expiration of various professional and occupational licenses issued to members of the armed forces serving on active duty.

SB 1009 military reservations; facilities; security
An emergency measure that makes criminal trespassing on a military reservation or facility a class 6 felony, authorizes the Adjutant General to implement Department of Defense (DOD) security methods and requires new and current Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (DEMA) employees to have a fingerprint clearance cards.

SB 1034 wireless telephone contracts; military personnel
Allows military service members called on active duty or their spouses to cancel, without penalty, their wireless telephone service contracts.

SB 1035 military veterans; tuition waiver
The bill would provide tuition waivers to military veterans residing in the state to attend an Arizona community college or public university under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Board of Regents. Fiscal Note Available

SB 1169 military family relief; fund; committee
Expands the pool of individuals eligible to serve on the Military Relief Fund (Fund) Advisory Committee (Committee) and further defines and limits eligible assistance paid to military family members from the Fund.

SB 1277 task force; retraining disabled veterans
Creates a six-member Task Force for Retraining Disabled Military Veterans.

SB 1320 veterans’ home facility; appropriation extension
Extends the $10,000,000 appropriation for the state veterans’ home from lapsing until June 30, 2010.

SB 1334 compact; educational opportunity; military children.
Establishes the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children (Compact) and the Interstate Commission on Educational Opportunity for Military Children (Commission) to address the educational transition issues of children of military families.

SB 1379 military installation fund; lands acquired
Allows the state land department to accept title to and manage real estate, property rights and related infrastructure and requires the Department of Veterans’ Services to transfer any real estate, property rights and infrastructure for preserving or enhancing military installations.

SB 1430 veterans’ home facility; appropriation extension
Extends the $10,000,000 appropriation for the state veterans’ home from lapsing until June 30, 2010.

SCR 1030 disabled veterans property tax exemption
Establishes a constitutional property tax exemption for disabled veterans or their unmarried surviving spouse.

HB 2026 veterans; game and fish licenses
Expands the requirements for veterans who can receive complimentary game and fish licenses.

HB 2223 retired military veterans; in-state tuition
Clarifies that members of the United States armed forces who are stationed in Arizona pursuant to military orders, their spouses, and their dependent children are entitled to immediate classification as an in-state student and allows an honorably discharged member of the USAF, who has not been domiciled in this state for one year, to be classified as in-state student if they are registered to vote in Arizona.

The proposed strike-everything amendment to HB 2223 clarifies that members of the U.S. military who are stationed in Arizona pursuant to military orders, their spouses and their dependent children are entitled to immediate classification as an in-state student. Additionally, the amendment provides for the transfer of educational benefits, to the extent permitted by Federal law, to dependents of an active U.S. armed forces member, a discharged veteran of the U.S. military or a member of the U.S. armed forces killed in combat.

HB 2249 military procession right-of-way
Provides regulations for those participating in and directing a military procession. The bill contains an Emergency Clause.
Amendment to the Strike-Everything Amendment
· Modifies the definition of a military procession to include vehicles accompanying a person who is being honored at a military event or a monument that is being transported in this state which honors United States military members or veterans.

HB 2260 military justice; technical correction
Makes a technical correction. Striker has been adopted that has changed the content of the bill.

HB 2261 national guard; technical correction
Makes a technical correction. Striker has been adopted that has changed the content of the bill.

HB 2519 health spa contracts; military members
Allows an active duty member of the U.S. military or the member’s legally designated representative to cancel or suspend a health spa contract within 90 days of receiving notice of active duty deployment outside of Arizona.

HB 2720 compact; educational opportunity; military children
Establishes the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children (Compact) and the Interstate Commission on Educational Opportunity for Military Children (Commission) to address the educational transition issues of children of military families.

HB 2803 GPLET; military use zones
Establishes new notification and economic analysis requirements for leases and development agreements between a prime lessee and a government lessor that are entered into after May 31, 2008. Additionally, government property improvements located in military use zones are exempted for up to eight years from the Government Property Lease Excise Tax (GPLET).
Amendments
· Exempts leases or development agreements involving rental residential housing from the economic estimate analysis requirements of the Act.
· Narrows the definition of military use zone.

HB 2815 veterans’ home facility; appropriation extension
Extends the $10,000,000 appropriation for the state veterans’ home from lapsing until June 30, 2010.

HB 2821 accommodation schools; military reservations; board
Expands the definition of accommodation school. Establishes the requirements for the governing board of an accommodation school. Allows the board to include P.L. 81-874 assistance allocated for children with disabilities to children living within the boundaries of an accommodation school. Modifies the equalization assistance for education for accommodation schools.

HB 2846 tuition waivers; disabled veterans; spouses
The bill would provide tuition waivers to military veterans spouses or dependents who received a purple heart to attend an Arizona community college or public university under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Board of Regents.

HCR 2002 property tax exemption; disabled veterans
Establishes a constitutional property tax exemption for disabled veterans or their unmarried surviving spouse.
Amendments
Replaces the term household income with income from all sources.
Adds surviving spouses of those killed in action or a combat zone to those who qualify for a tax exemption.
Makes technical and conforming changes. Fiscal Note Available

HCR 2012 veterans’ honors
Resolves that the state legislature recognize the Black Star and Silver Star Service Banners to honor those veterans who have been wounded or disabled.

HCR 2031 military personnel; technical correction
Amends the constitution to state that any military personnel stationed in Arizona are not considered residents of the state.

Constituent Mail: Commentary On SB1214~Concealed Weapons;School Campus

SB1214 – Separating Fact from Hyperbole

As can be expected with any socially-charged topic, the issue of Sen. Karen Johnson’s (and co-sponsors) SB1214 has created quite a stir here in Arizona. Unfortunately, there is more emotion, exaggeration, and distortion of facts being bantered about than at a WWE ‘SmackDown’.

First and foremost, I’d place a huge wager that the vast majority of those lambasting this bill have never read it, nor the associated Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) concerning firearms use, possession, carry, and related issues. Research SB1214 and ARS Title 13, Chapter 32 at http://www.azleg.gov/ and stop listening to the ignorant (uneducated) emotionally pontificate on this issue.

Let’s establish some foundational facts:
1. Federal Law already allows certified CCW licensees to carry weapons on school grounds (18 USC § 922(q)(2)(B)(ii)) – unless otherwise restricted by local law. Some states (e.g., Utah) do not restrict CCW carry on campuses, and there are no ‘wild west shoot outs’ as a result.
2. Legal concealed weapons carry is already the law of Arizona. CCW licensees are subjected to an extensive law enforcement check, where any significant prior infractions disqualify an applicant. Applicants are required to be 21 or older, attend regulated mandated training including firearms use, safety, laws, and legal briefings on use of deadly force. Applicants must pass safety and practical shooting exams at a range – under supervision of certified instructors.
3. Most CCW holders are experienced firearms owners/operators – all have passed the training and investigation. Many, like me, are current or former military with extensive weapons training. Because we are conscientious no-nonsense folks, the general public isn’t even aware we are armed in the grocery stores, gas stations, malls, cinemas, and convenience stores you frequent.
4. Despite the Chicken Little-like cries of anti-gunners, Arizona did not fall into chaos when licensed CCW became state law in 1994. You don’t see licensed CCW holders shooting jay-walkers and candy-bar shop lifters like the anti-gun folks warned. Nor have any of the 48 states which have codified their citizens’ rights granted under the U.S. Constitution (that would be the 2nd Amendment to those who never read that either) had systematic problems with CCW holders. (Note: most states, like AZ, have ‘shall issue’ CCW laws, another 8 have ‘may issue’ laws.)
5. SB1214 does not require anyone to carry a weapon, anywhere. SB1214 does not demand that anyone use a weapon, in any circumstance. Distortions and outright lies aside, SB1214 will not arm students and teachers around AZ. It forces no one to do anything.
6. Sen. Johnson’s bill proposes that individuals, meeting rigid state-sanctioned requirements, be permitted (not required or obligated) to carry a weapon in the heretofore ‘gun free school zones’ should they wish; same as we do in our homes, businesses, stores, parks, etc. This harmonizes state law with federal.
7. While many violent criminals and murderers are mentally deficient – few are so stupid as to plan an attack on an armed target. Claims that such persons don’t “think clearly or logically, so he would not reason through the possibility of confrontation with an armed teacher” (a.k.a. victim) lacks credibility and logic. Why do these same attackers target schools (a.k.a. ‘gun free zones’) instead of police stations, National Guard Armories, Military Installations, or even sportsmen at the local gun club/range?
8. Even the suicidal psychopaths that eventually take their own lives are looking for soft targets to maximize their demented 15-minutes of fame. Armed trained adults on campus might not totally deter such psychos – but they might be able to end their carnage while the victim count is still low. (Case in point: 09-Dec-07, an armed CCW church member in Colorado stopped Matthew Murray before he killed anyone inside the church; he had previous killed 2 people at a missionary training facility and 2 people in the church parking lot. After being incapacitated by the experienced CCW licensee, Murray killed himself.)

Much of the anti SB1214 propaganda has been by teachers. Those I have read recite the same disingenuous fear-based nonsense that permitting guns on campus will result in more random violence… shootings over hallway scuffles and lunch line cuts. In their illogical world, CCW holders who carry and behave responsibly everywhere else in the state will suddenly become idiots when on a school campus. I think not.

Some teachers have stated they don’t want to carry guns; great – they shouldn’t. But their fear, inexperience, and lack of training should not preclude those who are properly trained and motivated from doing so.

SB1214 is a good idea – one which gets the full support of citizens like myself who are willing, able, and fully qualified to protect myself and/or my charges.

Respectfully,
Joe Walker
Nationally Certified Firearms Instructor
AZ State Certified Firearms Instructor
Former US Army Officer (Ranger, Airborne)

Joe Walker has been an avid shooter since childhood; he was raised around firearms and learned their safe and effective use at an early age. He became a certified shooting instructor while competing on his university’s rifle team in the mid-1970s. Later, he received advanced precision long range shooting training with the US Army and served as the Captain of one of the Army’s installation Rifle & Pistol Teams. He has participated in civilian and military shooting competitions domestically and internationally. He is a nationally certified firearms instructor and an Arizona State certified CCW course instructor. He has an AZ CCW license and is a decorated veteran Army Officer.